Watching this movie was a great experience. This is not a movie to watch for fun or entertainment purpose. Court deals with the serious issues of a common man's life and depicts the condition of courts and legal procedure in India. All the characters have something to tell. Beautifully made. Deserves more audience.
Court (2015) 720p YIFY Movie
When an aging activist is arrested, the lives of the accused, the lawyers, and the judge intertwine to reveal bigotry that underscores the judicial system.
IMDB: 7.70 Likes
- Genre: Drama |
- Quality: 720p
- Size: 985.91M
- Resolution: 1280*800 / 23.976 fpsfps
- Language: English
- Run Time: 116
- IMDB Rating: 7.7/10
- MPR: Normal
- Peers/Seeds: 3 / 16
The Synopsis for Court (2015) 720p
A sewerage worker's dead body is found inside a manhole in Mumbai. An ageing folk singer is tried in court on charges of abetment of suicide. He is accused of performing an inflammatory song which might have incited the worker to commit the act. As the trial unfolds, the personal lives of the lawyers and the judge involved in the case are observed outside the court.
The Director and Players for Court (2015) 720p
The Reviews for Court (2015) 720p
Beautiful piece of art.Reviewed byyadavmanjeet-42710Vote: 8/10
Chaitanya Tamhane's 'Court' examines the nature of the Indian Judiciary System. The first-time Writer-Director delivers A Frighteningly Good Film, that hits you like a ton of bricks.
'Court' Synopsis: A sewerage worker's dead body is found inside a manhole in Mumbai. An aging folk singer is tried in court on charges of his supposed suicide. He is accused of performing an inflammatory song which might have incited the worker to commit the act. As the trial unfolds, the personal lives of the lawyers and the judge involved in the case are observed outside the court.
'Court' is about justice & injustice. The narrative makes you laugh (intentionally) & also questions your depiction of what's right or wrong. Is Freedom of Speech right? Is an accusation enough for us to keep a man behind the bars? Is it right to prolong a case, till it ages beyond imagination. Is the law fighting for what's right? Tamhane's Screenplay is shocking & hard-hitting. But, this isn't a depressing tale, its an interesting one, that keeps you engrossed. Tamhane's Direction is subtle, very life-like. The Cinematography captures the journey of its characters, with a sense of paranoia. The Performances are effective, with all the actors delivering perfectly.
'Court' has been selected as the official entry to the Oscars from India Today. And if the campaign goes right, it will give its terrific competitors a good fight.
Saw this at the Rotterdam film festival 2015 (IFFR), where it was part of the Bright Future section (and indeed, it deservedly belonged in that section). In short: Very well done, in all respects. We get an inside view in the Indian legal system and also in normal life there, the latter while we follow opposing council and see how they live outside the court. And in the final scene, when the case is all over, we also follow the judge on a family trip. This final scene is somewhat detached from the core story, but its purpose becomes clear when seeing the judge on a holiday trip in family circles. It seemed a loose end, but fits nicely in the setup, after all.
The Indian legal system is portrayed very well and (as far as I can see) objectively, not leaving a bad impression behind. Prosecution and defense council act believably and competently, and each gets their say. The judge on his side goes strictly by the book. That being his role in the proceedings, I have no problem with him either. The police force is portrayed less positive, if not merely incompetent, showing tunnel vision when locating suspects and witnesses. Interestingly, typically Indian I assume, we see laws quoted from the colonial age. This is remarkable but apparently a fact of contemporary Indian life. And, as judge agrees with prosecution, it IS current law hence applies in this case. In the final Q&A, the director confirms that many laws are outdated, requiring interpretation to establish what they really mean nowadays.
I noted two loose facts from the Q&A. Firstly, the slum area we see when one of the witnesses is brought back to her family, looks true to reality. Nearly demolished places like that coexist in the same city. Secondly, as far as the actors are concerned, we learn that 90% was non-professional. For that reason, Narayan's songs are playbacked.
To conclude: Some people in Western countries may find nearly two hours running time overly long, but it did not feel that way. I think that is caused by mixing court scenes with family scenes outside the court room. As such, we see the formal proceedings indoors next to what happens outdoors in personal lives of councils and judge. Intermixing these two worlds works very well. Indeed, the story seems to drag some of the time, just like the actual court case does, but it did not hinder me at all, as there were ample developments, and last-but-not-least interesting local folklore that we would never had the chance to see if not through this movie.